Sunday, April 28, 2013

“Little Girls Wiser Than Men” by Leo Tolstoy



“Little Girls Wiser Than Men” by Leo Tolstoy is as straightforward a short story as they come. Two girls, Malasha and Akoulya, disobey their mothers’ rules by playing in the mud after church and watch as their rebellion escalades and leads nearly the entire village into hysterical, mindless bickering. The short story is a dramatic interpretation of Matthew 18:3—Tolstoy is fairly explicit about that, to the point of actually citing the verse at the end of the story. Basically, the verse says that no one will enter the kingdom of Heaven until they change and become like children.
I can read “Little Girls Wiser Than Men” no other way than an allegory for the Biblical fall of man. With the children representing the original sinners Adam and Eve, fallen from a state of perfection (the church they came from before playing in the mud puddle), the mud representing sin, and the people of the town representing every human that has lived since Adam and Eve and had to cope with pre-existing sin, the poem is an allegory about the fall to sin and the way that mankind struggles to cope with it by fixating on casting blame rather than dealing with the sin itself. Like Adam and Eve, the girls had both been warned about and understood the consequences of disobeying the rules but make a conscious decision to anyway. Akoulya tells Malasha “your mother will scold you (if you go in)”. We are to notice patterns throughout the poem, particularly in the way that “different houses,” (or households, collectively) have the same standards of conduct: you keep your clothes clean, you don’t play in the mud, etc.  These are to represent Scripture put in place for our own good as humans.
And how about all the violence? Tolstoy uses violence to show us how sin makes us digress. Three times, various characters respond to conflict by acting on their primal impulses to hit. The first was when Malasha soils Akoulya’s dress by splashing it with muddy water, when “she was angry and ran after Malásha to strike her.” The next, we would probably agree, is even more alarming because it is a woman hitting a child (a child that is not even hers, might I add). Akoulya blames her soiled dress on Malasha, and “at this, Akoúlya's mother seized Malásha, and struck her on the back of her neck”—just like that, no questions asked. This upset Malasha’s mother, who came out onto the street and began quarreling with the woman hitting her child, “till one gave another a push.”
Age isn’t the point here; don’t be misled by the title. Were it not for the older woman of the poem, it might seem that way—that Tolstoy was making an argument very similar to the one that William Blake made in his poem “Infant Joy,” (published in Songs of Innocence): that is, that the wisest among us are those most blameless and pure, and wisdom fades with age. However, the old woman who enters about halfway through the poem has as much insight as the young girls because she understands that fighting is not going to solve anything.
Tolstoy’s concept of wisdom might be oversimplified and unrealistic.  The story resolves with the young girls “laughing” and “delighted,” but we know that sin cannot be laughed off or “forgotten”. Regardless, Tolstoy expertly creates an allegory that makes us look at how humanity deals with its fallen nature. - Elise Cofield

12 comments:

  1. It is interesting that Tolstoy chooses to explicitly cite the verse in Matthew. The story does appear to parallel the descriptions of human nature in the Bible. Although Tolstoy does not directly state his intentions, his citing the verse reminds me of Milton prefacing Paradise Lost by claiming that he wrote it "to justify the ways of God to man."

    ReplyDelete
  2. It appears that Tolstoy has successfully created a good story to represent the fall of man, although, like you said, the story ending with the girls laughing is not an entirely correct notion. The way we play the blame game instead of taking the fall ourselves leads to chaos. I like how the violence isn't restricted to a certain age - between children, between a child and an adult, and between two adults. It shows that every person has something in common.

    Hannah Aycock

    ReplyDelete
  3. The way Tolstoy cites the verse is fascinating and creates a different interpretation then what you would think. Without the Bible verse, it wouldn't have the same meaning with the sin and how all humans deal with the temptations in life. Your analysis makes me want to read it and try to understand more what Tolstoy wanted us to take for it. Great job!

    ReplyDelete
  4. This short story can certainly be read as a representation of the Fall of man. I see the parallels between the two girls and Adam and Eve. One leads the other to commit an act that neither should have done. Also, I agree with Hannah that Tolstoy's use of violence unifies the characters.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This story seems to be very interesting and I am not sure why you opened your essay with “[This story] is as straightforward a short story as they come.” I was drawn to your entry because the title sparked my interest but I almost didn’t read your entry because the opening sentence detracted my interest. I like how you were able to parallel the story to the bible verse so thoroughly. I also like how you sort of explained how the sin of the entire village escalated from one small, seemingly insignificant event. I also like how you related this short story to something that we had read in this class.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I like the use of violence as a unifying factor because it is somewhat the opposite of how people view violence. I think we tend to view violence as a result of anger that we learn to control as we grow older. Instead, Tolstoy illustrates all age groups demonstrating violence. Sounds like an interesting read! -Hollie Roberts

    ReplyDelete
  7. I definitely agree with your analysis and the relation the short story has to the fall of man. Your evidence and commentary show the depth in which Tolstoy portrayed this act. It also reminds me of several biblical instances in which readers are told to become like children in Christ. People must first be "born again" in Christ, and then they are children in Christ until they mature with time, study, and knowledge. It definitely sounds like an interesting read as well.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I absolutely love the title of this short story.
    I think that from your analysis, it says it all. I also think that Tolstoy wanted to allude to the lesson of patience from the Bible just from how you spoke about conflict and wisdom.
    I will definitely be reading this one!

    ReplyDelete
  9. It's amazing how authors are able to write stories alluding to the Bible and give readers a better understanding of those religious stories instead of making light of the originals. Such works also provide a different outlook on the same lessons that have been present in homes for centuries. Growing up, I was always told that "we are called to be children of Christ." This poem only strenghens that belief.
    - Emily Alves

    ReplyDelete
  10. I really enjoyed your analysis of the story! I agree that the bible verse makes the story. It solidifies the message it is trying to convey and it helps the reader gain a better understanding.
    Also, after reading this, I am convinced I need to read this story!

    ReplyDelete
  11. I like the analysis and your acknowledgment of many possible interpretations. I think the laughter at the end of the story is an acceptable parallel to the relationship between God and man. After all, this story is about forgiveness, the author of which is God. We might not be able to forget our sins, but God promises that if we will accept Him, He will forget them for us. These little girls who can laugh and experience joy after all that has been done are more God-like than we as adults are half the time.

    ReplyDelete
  12. It is analysis and your knowledge of many possibilities interpersonal. I really enjoyed your analysis the story!

    ReplyDelete