Sunday, April 28, 2013

“The Ambitious Guest” by Nathaniel Hawthorne



            “The Ambitious Guest” is a short story written by Nathaniel Hawthorne and published in his collection Twice-Told Tales.  The story tells of a family who lives by themselves in the mountains of New England.  The family entertains lonely guests as they pass through the mountain.  One night a stranger arrives and pours out his emotion to the family, about how he wants to leave a monument to his name and does not want to leave this world without making some sort of memorable impact.  During the discussion, rocks tumble down the mountain, prompting the father to tell the visitor not to worry, that rocks often fall from the mountain, and they have a shelter to flee to in a time of real trouble.  As the night lengthens, the discussion grows deeper and more meaningful—even the children join in from their beds, talking about life after they grow up.  The conversation ends after the grandmother has given a wish for her dying day.  Not long after the conversation ends, “the slide” occurs, and rocks and boulders tumble down the mountain in catastrophic way.  The family and the stranger flee the house toward the safe place but are caught in the slide and killed while the house remains perfectly intact.  Later on, people remember the family for their kindness and hospitality, but no one knew the fate of the stranger or even if a stranger had passed by on that tragic night.
            The overall theme of this story is death and the impact a person leaves behind after death.  The stranger is consumed with the idea that he has to be remembered in the world; however, he painfully realizes that he has made no outstanding contributions to the world for which to be remembered.  The reason for the journey of the man is never disclosed, but he may have been on a journey to find his destiny.  When he finds his destiny, he says he will say, “Let death come!  I shall have built my monument!”  The story also recounts how this man has never allowed himself to become emotionally connected with anyone before; however, he does allow himself to become close to this family.  Perhaps the man’s destiny was to pull down the barrier keeping him from human connection; once he becomes fully a part of the family and embraces his destiny—unknowingly—death answers his call and the rocks slide.  He had built his monument, which was to one family, instead of the whole world.
            The family members also dwell on death and lonesomeness.  The father tells his family of his wish to have some kind of gravestone—whether nice or not—that marks his grave, and the grandmother tells of how she wants someone to hold a mirror in front of her corpse so she can make sure she looks alright.  The stranger announces, “Old and young, we dream of graves and monuments.”  The family—though tucked away in the crevice of a lonely mountain—is seldom lonely because weary travelers pass by often.  They feed and house strangers when needed and make themselves readily available for them.  Even though they live in a lonely place, they are not lonely, in contrast to the stranger, who has lived in busy places but has always been lonely until that night. 
            Another aspect of death that is crafted in this story is its unexpectedness and irony—though all the characters talk about death, the grandmother is the only one who mentions that her grave is not very far away.  The father speaks of when he and his wife are grey-haired, and the stranger speaks of great adventures.  The children do not even think about death but only about their adult life.  Death takes everyone in one instant—the young and old, lonely and not lonely—and leaves only an empty house as a monument.  Also, their death is ironic because they leave the house in search of a safe place when, in reality, the house was their safe place.  This could mean that this family, though they sometimes dream of a life outside their simple home, is meant to play this role in life and that they were fulfilling their own destiny by staying in the house.  The only time they are in trouble is when they leave the house.  The house also stands, then, as a monument to the family.  The stranger leaves no monument for the world; people do not even know if he actually existed or not.  Though death is unexpected for the characters, Hawthorne uses foreshadowing to allow the reader’s to know the characters’ fate.  He asks “Is not the kindred of a common fate a closer tie than that of birth?” when explaining the stranger’s connection to the family.  Also, the stranger’s final words are "I wonder how mariners feel when the ship is sinking, and they, unknown and undistinguished, are to be buried together in the ocean--that wide and nameless sepulchre?"  This implies that all these characters—mostly unknown and undistinguished—are about to be buried together in a wide and nameless place—the mountain—where no one will ever find their bodies.
                 Finally, the children represent hope and a future; they are young and happy and bring joy to everyone in the household.  At one point, one child asks to go get water from the Flume, a brook in the mountain.  The adults laugh off the request to leave the warmth of the cabin, but when a wagon stops in front of the house for a moment before continuing on, the boy insists that they could have gotten the drivers to take them to the Flume.  Once again, the adults laugh.  Could the characters have escaped their death if they had taken up the ride?  The fate of the wagon drivers is not disclosed.  Perhaps, Hawthorne is saying that without taking chances, a person cannot leave a monument in this world.  The family took chances every time they allowed a stranger into their home.  The stranger may have been on his way to take a chance and build his monument, but his opening up to the family was him taking a chance as well, which allowed him to be known to the family, if not the world.  Should they have gone with the wagon drivers?  They probably should not have since them leaving the house at the end is what ensures their death.  Besides, they had already taken their chances in life and established their monument.- Hannah Aycock

10 comments:

  1. The stranger in this story interested me the most. He wanted to be this great person and be remembered long after he was gone but was forgotten. We can all related to the stranger. We want to go on this great adventures and be remembered but we must also connect with people. It seems like Hawthorne is saying that to live life fully, we must open up and explore things that terrify us. Great job!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with Audrey, I find the stranger very interesting as well. Often we are told to make a name for our self. However, unless you leave a mark of your impact on the world, no one outside you sphere of influence will likely remember that you even existed. Great analysis!

      Delete
  2. I love your varied syntax and well-developed paragraphs. I really enjoyed this analysis!! You offered an effective summary and a very well-structured argument and analysis. The conclusion could use some development but everything else is great. I greatly enjoy Hawthorne and this story seems to be so relatable and profound. The irony is appealing in that the entire purpose of the stranger was to build a monument but after the avalanche, no one is sure if a stranger was even present. This concept in itself is so rich and intellectually satisfying because it is so layered and one is able to turn it over and over in the mind; for instance, it could be argued (like you argued) that the stranger made an impact on the family, which creates the perspective that significant contribution in the world are not the most important, the little ones are such as the stranger to the family. One could also take an entirely different approach to this story and observe that the possibly of a nonexistent stranger would put into question the sanity of the family; each family member passionately participated and they ultimately waited to o long to flee to ‘safety’ when they were in fact fleeing from safety. Could the entire family be insane or just downright suicidal? They are isolated from civilization. Anyway I enjoyed your entry. Great job!

    ReplyDelete
  3. For a man who wanted to leave a mark on the world, the stranger's nameless, unknown fate is ironic. So much talk of a monument raised in his honor and the philosophy of life did nothing for this fame-seeker. He wanted to leave a legacy on a grand scale, but I agree that his purpose was to open himself up to others rather than to make a monument. I've heard that people go in their best moment, so this could be the stranger's case. The death of the family is also ironic, as you point out, because only the grandmother was certain of a near death. It is interesting that, though the family didn't seek recognition, their house stands as a reminder of them.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I love the way you wrote this and I adore all the irony. I don't think the ironic end defames anyone in the story, but rather makes you like the characters more. Hawthorne can make you wince, and I think that's a big reason people still read his works. I absolutely hated the part where the slide takes all of their lives, and the house they had fled stayed standing. I like that you touched on so many possible meanings. Great stuff.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I really enjoyed all the possibilities in your analysis. What I took from it was a simple reminder that death doesn't discriminate, it takes people of all ages. Therefore, we need to live each day as if it is our last! -Hollie Roberts

    ReplyDelete
  6. I enjoyed your interpretation of this short story. I think that your analysis is very detailed and plausible. While I was reading, I couldn't help but wonder if Hawthorne was warning people away from being too ambitious. While I do agree with your interpretation, I also thought that maybe death came to the stranger because he was only concerned with glory rather than truly leaving a meaningful monument. I'm not sure if this interpretation is correct, since I am just going off of your summary, but it's just food for thought.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I really like your analysis! The story seems to evoke the human need to be appreciated or known: sometimes this need is expressed in negative ways. I think of all of the celebrities who are just famous for being famous. All of that seems from people being overly concerned what others will think of them on a surface level, when really it should be about helping each other- which it seems like he did help the family like you mentioned in your analysis.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I love Hawthorne! I find the stranger to be the most interesting. He wanted glory so bad but received none. In many mythological writings, glory was all anyone wanted and they seemed always receive it one way or another. However, for the stranger, I wonder if he wanted it too badly. We know him as a stranger so we don't feel much of a connection but Hawthorne makes him the most mysterious and fascinating. Again, Hawthorne is great!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Thank you amd i like it and it help me a lot in studying '🙏🙏🙏

    ReplyDelete